A polariton can be seen as a molecule of light and matter. Much like an atom binds an electron to a nucleus, a polariton binds a photon (a particle of light) to an exciton (a particle of matter).[1] Such a bonding is made possible by confining both excitations in a cavity, where they are both trapped and therefore compelled to interact. Without the cavity, which consists in two mirrors facing each others, the photon would simply fly away. But the mirrors make the photons bounce back and forth, hitting the crystal in the process and once in a while creating an excitation—that's our exciton—as the photon gets absorbed. The exciton is unstable, like a positron (it is in fact a bound electron-hole pair), an after a while, recombines to create another photon. The process repeats itself, for as long as the photon stays in the cavity. According to Quantum Mechanics, this generates a quantum superposition of the two possible states, just like the Schrödinger cat, but instead of being alive and dead simultaneously, the particle is light and matter simultaneously:
$$\ket{\mathrm{photon}}+\ket{\mathrm{exciton}}$$
These half-light/half-matter particles have fantastic properties, which they inherit from their underlying components:
They have a mass, like matter, but a very light-one (the photon has none in vacuum and a small effective one when confined in a cavity).
Their dynamics consist of characteristic Rabi oscillations.[2] In presence of a weak nonlinearity, this turns into the problem of Josephson oscillations.[3]
The concept was first proposed theoretically, and christened so, by John Hopfield[4], and its most fruitful implementation, in 2D, was discovered experimentally during a sabbatical stay in Arakawa's group in Tokyo by Claude Weisbuch,[5] who referred to it as his «Japanese effect.»[6] Weisbuch did not initially recognized it as a Hopfield polariton, or "bulk polariton", for which the photon is delocalized in the full 3D crystal, but as a cavity QED effect (Weisbuch was in fact already a polariton expert, having reported its first resonant observation 15 years earlier[7]). The situation was quickly settled during the July (1993) Erice Summer School on "Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications" which featured «heated sessions (involving in particular the two Elis, Eli Burstein and Eli Yablonovitch) on the nature of these excitations» according to Weisbuch himself.[8] The name of "Cavity-Polariton" was then agreed to well describe Hopfield's counterpart in reduced dimensionality, and be more suitable than Weisbuch's initial choice for merly Rabi splitting:
The term "vacuum field Rabi splitting" has so far been used for semiconductor microcavities in analogy to atomic physics where this effect was first observed. From a solid state physics point of view, where dispersion has to be considered, the term "cavity-polariton" is more appropriate.
The first appearance of the "cavity polariton" term was in Ref. [9], where the idea of the underlying dispersion was being formed. The breakthrough came in Ref. [10] where the now famous polariton dispersion was provided for the first time:
It seems that the theorists who should have predicted cavity-polaritons are C. Andreani et al.,[11] who narrowly missed it by overlooking the dimensionality mismatch could be fixed with a cavity. He seems, however, to have readily understood (and explained) it[12] to R. Houdré et al. as they were shaping the field.[6]
Important concepts (I'm particularly interested in) include:
A historical review of the polariton concept, from Hopfield's lone-warrior paper[4] that gets all the credit despite fairly serious variations with the finally adopted results (including in its operational definition, involving four operators), along with other contributions.[13][14]
The topic is covered at depth in our book Microcavities. Reviews include [15][16][17][18].
Historical overviews includes Refs. [19][6], etc.