One year already
youtube.com/watch?v=HlT-vwâŠ
| ||||||||
30 March (2022)
Replying to @RT_com
$ is not an easy snake to trample on.
Avec le Rouble indexé sur l'or, il faudra donc acheter ce gaz avec de l'or. L'argent est redevenu coûteux pour les occidentaux, plus de planche à billets. Il faudra donc soit se passer de gaz, soit payer, soit entrer en guerre (une action en justice reviendra au premier point).
Ruble bound to gold. We are finally entering the post-post-WW2 era. Money is not infinite anymore. The dollar should soon be worth in rubles what a ruble is currently worth in dollars.
We're now at a stage where I can't figure out if most of the things we see are true or fake. This one is apparently true. I still don't believe it is. I didn't find it funny even as a joke. What is left then, nihilism? Just ignore everything under the pretext it's probably fake?
Replying to @newstart_2024 and @backtolife_2022
That is probably what History books will retain in their opening chapters on what is coming.
29 March (2022)
Replying to @RT_com
it's becoming a cold war by all the acceptions of the term.
28 March (2022)
If even the lesser of the alleged crimes committed in Ukraine by the regime and its battalions are true, they would justify an external intervention. People who support unconditionally one side should maybe take the time to ponder whether their full endorsement is deserved. t.co/sQCuWhKyMW
since the account has been suspended, for my own recording, this was about people strapped to poles, with their pants down, flogged and abandoned there, to the cold and humiliation. One man with a broken nose bleeding over his shoes had peed himself out of fear.
26 March (2022)
Replying to @newstart_2024 and @backtolife_2022
Match retour avec un nouveau joueur dans l'Ă©quipe.
22 March (2022)
CĂ©lĂ©brĂ© comme compositeur d'"Eddy Mitchell", l'immense compositeur Pierre Papadiamandis nous quitte ce jour. C'est cependant pour un texte de Michel Delpech qu'il signe sa plus jolie composition, sur notre rĂ©publique endeuillĂ©e et dĂ©voyĂ©e: youtube.com/watch?v=HwPXJsâŠ
How handy that nothing has a meaning anymore.
19 March (2022)
So much pain and cruelty in pretending. This culture of respect and inclusion is really of despisal and cynicism. Besides, when others ahead in the male lineup will let their feminine side succumb to the appeal of trophies and podiums, Lia's rejection and misery will be complete.
18 March (2022)
To better understand the Asch Experiment in a modern context: youtube.com/watch?v=iRh5qyâŠ
Replying to @newstart_2024 and @backtolife_2022
I suspect this is an Asch experiment where society is probed to see at which point people will dare voice that this is nonsense.
Replying to @PhysWlv
I'm shocked to realize that with the better resolution of the pictures, Eratosthenes' 6-pack abs were fake!
15 March (2022)
12 March (2022)
Nous ne sommes pas dans une dĂ©mocratie. Avec ces manĆuvres pour Ă©carter ceux qui gĂȘnent, ne fut-ce qu'un minimum, la transition de la dĂ©mocratie de l'Ă©cole du mensonge Ă celle des tartuffes (en passant par les malades imaginaires) est achevĂ©e.
Replying to @JulesTorres17 and @Valeurs
Ăa a plus de classe que de l'avoir envoyĂ© en prison, s'il en avait eu les moyens...
Et encore, il en manque, tel cet hĂŽpital Allemand refusant de soigner les Russes ou les agences de recherche rompant tous contacts avec les scientifiques Russes!
11 March (2022)
Here we are.
The article states that praise of the infamous Azov battalion is now also allowed, but that they "still won't allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians". For now.
The article states that praise of the infamous Azov battalion is now also allowed, but that they "still won't allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians". For now.
9 March (2022)
6 March (2022)
C'est-Ă -dire pas grand chose, encore une fois.
Replying to @rougeyronpierre and @chevblancoff
Y'a pas grand chose Ă prendre. Le texte est mĂ©diocre, il est pas foutu de se relire sans accrocher, plusieurs fois, il a les yeux dans sa feuille. C'est ça, l'Ă©loquence? OĂč sont les Guillemin aujourd'hui? Qui parlaient sans que l'on puisse mĂȘme imaginer qu'ils rĂ©citaient.
Replying to @rougeyronpierre and @100_Francs
Une fois qu'il a eu sa veste d'académicien, il lui a été facile de la retourner.
Replying to @david__co
Y t'as fallu quand mĂȘme 13865 secondes pour rĂ©agir!
Replying to @AttalPresident_ and @avecvous
C'te dégaine de croque-mort...
5 March (2022)
Replying to @LibreQg and @AnonymeCitoyen
On dirait un plan de coupe d'un directeur de gĂ©nie. MĂȘme Alfonso CuarĂłn, je crois pas qu'il mettrait autant de dĂ©tails. On vit quand mĂȘme une Ă©poque indicible.
@emmanuelcoup @LibreQg @alancelin C'est vrai que l'arborer protégerait sûrement d'un acharnement policier. Qui oserait risquer la symbolique d'une deuxiÚme manifestation de la force sur ces couleurs qui sont devenues celles du camp du bien?
à l'image de la force d'indignation de la France. Insipide, yeux baissés, mal lu. Bernanos: «Il y a des vérités qu'on ne peut plus dire en costume de carnaval» ou encore «Quand que je n'aurai plus qu'une paire de fesses pour penser, j'irai l'asseoir à l'Académie Française». t.co/tofbxtGUlF
4 March (2022)
Replying to @simondartigue
Bernanos justement: «Il y a des vérités qu'on ne peut plus dire en costume de carnaval» ou encore «Quand que je n'aurai plus qu'une paire de fesses pour penser, j'irai l'asseoir à l'Académie Française».
Replying to @QuiQuichotte1
On les aura acculĂ©s Ă l'Ă©mancipation. On les a poussĂ©s dans le vide, oĂč il y avait une riviĂšre, et ont les regarde du haut d'une falaise en feu.
Replying to @CNRS_dr07, @CNRS, @astusciences, @MontagneScience, @UCAuvergne, @OSU_OPGC, @ird_fr, @INRAE_Clermont, @ClrmntMetropole, @Departement63, @LampPhysique and @auvergnerhalpes
Faites gaffes y'a des Russes là -bas, ils m'ont appris ce que je sais, à l'Université.
Replying to @jeunes_debout and @DiscordDebout
Finalement, le seul qui a su trouver la réplique adéquate, c'est Tarel.
Replying to @newstart_2024 and @backtolife_2022
Moi j'irai pas me battre contre les Russes.
Replying to @CNRS and @sup_recherche
Pourquoi avoir attendu plus d'une semaine pour Ă©taler votre "plus grande fermetĂ©"? Vous n'Ă©tiez pas convaincus ce matin? La plus grande fermetĂ©, ça aurait Ă©tĂ© dĂšs le dĂ©but, non? DĂ©cidĂ©ment, la rigueur scientifique se perd... mĂȘme au CNRS. Qui d'autres de mĂ©chant Ă Ă©viter sinon?
Honte. DĂšs ce jour, tout crime politique ou humanitaire, du plus infime au plus infĂąme, s'il n'est pas condamnĂ©, dĂ©noncĂ© et rĂ©primandĂ© de la mĂȘme façon par le CNRS, sera donc justifiĂ© et supportĂ© par lui. SolidaritĂ© avec les collĂšgues scientifiques Russes.
Replying to @MaryMbois
Allez Bruno @BrunoLeMaire, vas le chercher celui-là aussi, t'as l'air motivé.
This is the great artist Netrebko, singing in Italian the torments of a French woman. Nasca il giorno, o il giorno muoia. Not willing to take a side on the ongoing afflictions of the World and remain 'sempre libera', she became a real 'traviata' and is now banned from performing.
She wrote: «Iâm Russian and I love my country, but I have many friends in Ukraine and the pain and suffering breaks my heart. I want this war to stop and people can live in peace. I hope so and I pray for that.»
«I am not an expert on politics. I am an artist and my goal is to unite across political differences.» Not a popular thing to say when war is boiling.
C'est effectivement un scénario possible. Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Ternopil. Un haïku nucléaire. Ne pas le voir, ne pas y croire, c'est là la plus grande folie. Bien sûr que l'état major Russe connait et comprend le minimax et qu'il a ce scénario sur la table depuis le début.
Replying to @Poulin2012
En plus il confond "ville Russe" avec "ville Ukrainienne". J'espĂšre que c'est un peu mieux calculĂ© tout ça. Le pire, c'est qu'il n'a pas tort. On ne mettra pas la Russie Ă genoux, y'a que Bruno Lemaire pour croire ça. Et avec son rĂ©tropĂ©dalage aprĂšs le tweet de Medevev, mĂȘme pas.
So that illustrates one of the Occident's 3 mistakes: 1. A Manichean narrative can be construed from distorted facts and diverted media. This image, which is from the invasion, of a Russian soldier in a Ukrainian shop, doesn't convey quite the same story.
3 March (2022)
Replying to @ZemmourEric
Câest celui qui gagnera qui dĂ©finira les responsabilitĂ©s.
2 March (2022)
Replying to @Maxoulemire
Mais non, on demandera aux Russes d'aider Ă maintenir le calme.
NadĂšge Abderrazak est une journaliste. Nous la connaissons pour son charisme et son courage, son charme aussi. Aujourd'hui, par les yeux de twitter, elle n'est plus une personne, mais un «MĂ©dia affiliĂ© Ă un Ătat, Russie». Ăcoutons Gheorghiu nous en expliquer le processus en 1949:
«La civilisation occidentale dans sa derniĂšre phase de progrĂšs ne prend plus conscience de lâindividu. Et rien ne nous permet dâespĂ©rer quâelle le fasse jamais. Cette SociĂ©tĂ© ne connaĂźt que quelques-unes des dimensions de lâindividu.
Lâhomme intĂ©gral, pris individuellement, nâexiste plus pour elle [...] Tout simplement, nous ne sommes pas. Nous existons seulement en tant que fractions infinitĂ©simales dâune catĂ©gorie [...]
Câest le maximum de notes caractĂ©ristiques que la SociĂ©tĂ© technique occidentale puisse assimiler. Câest lĂ tout ce qui peut te reprĂ©senter Ă ses yeux. Elle ne te reconnaĂźt que grĂące Ă ces traits distinctifs et te traite en consĂ©quence, avec tout le groupe auquel tu appartiens[âŠ]
La fauteâou le crimeâqui sont la cause de lâarrestation appartiennent Ă la catĂ©gorie [...] Ce motif est absurde du point de vue humain et parfaitement justifiĂ© du point de vue de la machine. LâOccident regarde lâhomme par les yeux de la technique.
Lâhomme en chair et en os, capable de joie et de souffrance est inexistant.» - La Vingt-CinquiĂšme Heure. Pas de nuance, un label, et nous voilĂ rangĂ© dans un camp, une catĂ©gorie. Comme Gheorghiu l'avait dĂ©jĂ aussi compris, ce n'est mĂȘme pas nous qui choisissons notre camp.
We are currently witnessing the typical thrill and mental intoxication that precedes world war. People get dizzy, excited, euphoric, passions are high, confusion maximum, a nationality becomes an army's flag, an artist becomes a propagandist, peace becomes treason or cowardice.
We see people suddenly committed to world peace, justice and love among nations demanding immediate war to enforce this. We see democracies calling for censorship, human rights enforcing hate, blind retaliation and gratuitous discriminations.
We have seen, for instance, massive censorship of press media branded as propaganda tools, wiping out entire editorial offices, we have seen already legendary artists like Netrebko banned from venues because they refuse to take a stance...
The world is angry. Everybody's patience is exhausted. Everybody has something to reproach to the other side. People not taking sides become traitors to all of them. The same old scenario, that brought misery, destruction and unhealing wounds to a humanity that never learns.
People don't want peace, they want victory. Usually at this stage, nothing can stop further escalation without passing through a painful phase of terror and destruction for everybody. The frenzy is so high, there's so much adrenaline that no fear of an obvious doom can detain us.
The only way out once this started would have been for the military operation to be fast and followed by a full withdrawal of Russian troops. And then negotiations, diplomacy and mutual appreciation of the balance of powers, with all the injustices and prerogatives this entails.
Instead, we have an extension of the crisis by supporting and maintaining resistance there, so that the military operation will lengthen in time, multiplying casualties and losses and weakening hopes of normalization, even if a precarious one. And of course risking a direct war.
And we have denial of Russia as a superpower, turning it into a pariah state instead and waging an ideological and economical war against it. So we have the two ingredients for escalation, extension in space and time of the conflict, generalization to other states: a world war.
To solve Ukraine's problem we will thus extend it to the planet as a whole. We will pay the violation of its sovereignty by sacrificing populations in Europe and Russia, possibly all of Ukraine. Then when the full world is broken, genuine aspirations for actual peace will emerge.
Then we will stop wondering whether Russians like their children too but remember that they are people just like us, and have been victims like us of the atrocities that will have been unleashed from both sides, on children, civilians, on our cities, on our civilization.
We will accept, still in blood and tears, that we are not the rightful good people and the others the evil responsible for everything, but that at the root of humanity's crimes is Cain killing his brother, not Putin invading Ukraine.
For one thing, between Cain and Putin, there is also Madeline Albright, Condoleeza Rice, Colin Pauwels, the peace Nobel prize of death, Obama. There's been, in passing, a war in Donbas since 2014, with around ten thousand casualties. We didn't care. And care even less now.
Peace will have to absolve considerably more crimes than those that have already been committed so far. Rationally, wanting peace is to recognize that there is an ongoing crisis, and that making it worse will, indeed, only achieve that.
Russia is a superpower. It is not Serbia or Lybia. Now that it chose to intervene, it will not yield by force, by direct confrontation, be it military, economic or other. It takes two to make war. Russia makes war to Ukraine but the Occident now wants its own war with Russia.
There was a time when the risk of nuclear conflicts was taken seriously. It seems that we've lost our respect for such a scenario, that we don't think it can really happen or that if it happens, we'll still be fine. All our modern fear seems to have gone into viruses.
Not wanting war is to recognize that it should stop quickly, which won't happen with more war, that will extend, delay and worsen. Putin made a mistake by attacking, but if we make a mistake greater than his in his wake, we will bear the cost and share responsibility.
1 March (2022)
Replying to @franceinfo
Maintenant qu'il a eu ce qu'il voulait, il peut sĂ»rement arrĂȘter.
Replying to @newstart_2024 and @backtolife_2022
La voix Française de Kevin Costner interprétait également le personnage mieux que l'acteur principal.
Macron et ses sbires risquent de se rendre compte que les Russes c'est pas les gilets jaunes, qu'on peut éborgner impunément le week-end et devant qui se donner des airs d'autorité et de bien fondé. Le monopole de la violence, ça marche plus quand les autres ont aussi une armée.
Il a pourtant dit "je veux laisser [sic] planer aucune ambiguïté" et "le peuple Russe en paiera aussi les conséquences, soyons clairs". Pour la clarté, zéro, et comme détermination totale, on avait vu plus viril. Cette stratégie de désescalade c'est plutÎt de la dégringolade.
This top minister in the French government congratulates himself on destroyingâbeyond PutinâRussia and its people. I've never heard so eager satisfaction from Macron's government, listing exhilaratingly the coercion, wrecking and escalation at their disposal. Speaks of total war.
C'est incroyable qu'un ministre qui fait des dĂ©clarations publiques, officielles, Ă la tĂ©lĂ© ou la radio, ou oĂč que ce fut, sa dĂ©monstration de virilitĂ© pouponne, tente ensuite d'en effacer les traces. Ăa laisse rĂȘveur sur sa vision du vrai monde. Tout ne peut pas s'effacer ainsi.