(Welcome to Epistemological Letters) |
m (→Epistemological Letters Lettres Épistemologiques Epistemologische Briefe) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{quote|<wz tagtotip="epistlett" width="310px";>"Epistemological Letters" are not a scientific journal in the ordinary sense. They want to create a basis for an open and informal discussion allowing confrontation and ripening of ideas before publishing in some adequate journal.</wz>|style={{opencite}}}} | + | {{quote|<wz tagtotip="epistlett" width="310px";>"Epistemological Letters" are not a scientific journal in the ordinary sense. They want to create a basis for an open and informal discussion allowing confrontation and ripening of ideas before publishing in some adequate journal.</wz>|style={{opencite}}}} |
= Epistemological Letters <p> Lettres Épistemologiques </p> Epistemologische Briefe = | = Epistemological Letters <p> Lettres Épistemologiques </p> Epistemologische Briefe = | ||
<big>Hidden Variables and Quantum Uncertainty </big> | <big>Hidden Variables and Quantum Uncertainty </big> | ||
− | The '''''Epistemological Letters''''' (Epistemol. Lett.) are ''underground'' [[scientific journal]] [[Scientific_Journals#Epistemological_Letters|publications]] at a time when academic journals were regarding [[foundations of quantum mechanics]] as not a scientific topic. | + | The '''''[[Epistemological Letters]]''''' (Epistemol. Lett.) are ''underground'' [[scientific journal]] [[Scientific_Journals#Epistemological_Letters|publications (more details here)]] at a time when academic journals were regarding [[foundations of quantum mechanics]] as not a scientific topic. |
− | + | Notable Letters include this debate over the years between [[Bell]] and [[Shimony]]{{etal}} on local realism: | |
− | *{{bell76b}} | + | *{{bell76b}} in Vol. 9 |
− | *{{shimony76a}} | + | *{{shimony76a}} in Vol. 13 |
+ | *{{bell77a}} in Vol. 15 | ||
+ | *{{shimony78a}} in Vol. 18 | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
* 16.0 M. Mugur-Schächter What is at Stake in the experiments on Bell's Inequality? 1 | * 16.0 M. Mugur-Schächter What is at Stake in the experiments on Bell's Inequality? 1 | ||
− | * 17.0 J. S. Bell The Theory of Local Beables 11 | + | * 17.0 J. S. Bell The Theory of Local Beables 11 {{cite|bell76b}} |
* 14.3 O. Costa de Beauregard Remarques à propos de 14.1 et 14.2 25 | * 14.3 O. Costa de Beauregard Remarques à propos de 14.1 et 14.2 25 | ||
* 14.4 F. Bonsack Réponse à 14.3 27 | * 14.4 F. Bonsack Réponse à 14.3 27 | ||
Line 95: | Line 97: | ||
== Issue 13, October, 1976 == | == Issue 13, October, 1976 == | ||
− | * 17.1 A. Shimony, M. A. Horne, J. F. Clauser Comment on "The Theory of Local Beables" 1 | + | * 17.1 A. Shimony, M. A. Horne, J. F. Clauser Comment on "The Theory of Local Beables" 1 {{cite|shimony76a}} |
* 17.2 P. A. Noldauer A remark on local causality 9 | * 17.2 P. A. Noldauer A remark on local causality 9 | ||
Line 107: | Line 109: | ||
* 25.0 S. Dimitru Uncertainty Relations or correlation relations? 1 | * 25.0 S. Dimitru Uncertainty Relations or correlation relations? 1 | ||
− | * 17.3 J. S. Bell Free Variables and Local Causality 79 | + | * 17.3 J. S. Bell Free Variables and Local Causality 79 {{cite|bell77a}} |
* 23.1 O. Costa de Beauregard Evidence expérimentale du paradoxe d'Einstein (suite) 85 | * 23.1 O. Costa de Beauregard Evidence expérimentale du paradoxe d'Einstein (suite) 85 | ||
== Issue 16, May, 1977 == | == Issue 16, May, 1977 == | ||
− | * 17.4 O. Costa de Beauregard | + | * 17.4 O. Costa de Beauregard Les duellistes Bell et Clauser-Horne-Shimony ("C.H.S.") s'aveuglent en refusant la "causalite rétrograde" inscrite en clair dans le formalisme 1 |
* 25.1 L.S. Hayants Remarks on the contribution of S.Dumitru (25.0) 9 | * 25.1 L.S. Hayants Remarks on the contribution of S.Dumitru (25.0) 9 | ||
Line 123: | Line 125: | ||
== Issue 18, January, 1978 == | == Issue 18, January, 1978 == | ||
− | * 17.4 A. Shimony Reply to Bell 17.3 1 | + | * 17.4 A. Shimony Reply to Bell 17.3 1 {{cite|shimony78a}} |
* 25.2 S. Dumitru A few replies to the remarks of professor L.S.Mayants (25.1) 5 | * 25.2 S. Dumitru A few replies to the remarks of professor L.S.Mayants (25.1) 5 | ||
* 27.2 O. Costa de Beauregard Réponse à B.d'Espagnat (27.1 18 | * 27.2 O. Costa de Beauregard Réponse à B.d'Espagnat (27.1 18 | ||
Line 311: | Line 313: | ||
* 73.0 C. Dewdney, A. Kyprianidis, J. P. Vigier Causal Non Local Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment and Quantum Statistics 71 | * 73.0 C. Dewdney, A. Kyprianidis, J. P. Vigier Causal Non Local Interpretation of the Double Slit Experiment and Quantum Statistics 71 | ||
* 71.0 M. Mugur-Schächter Esquisse d'une représentation générale et formalisée des descriptions et le type descriptionnel de la mécanigue quantique | * 71.0 M. Mugur-Schächter Esquisse d'une représentation générale et formalisée des descriptions et le type descriptionnel de la mécanigue quantique | ||
+ | <span id="epistlett">[[Image:October197613thIssue-finalpage.jpg|300px]]</span> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Links == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [https://curate.nd.edu/search?q=epistemological+letters Search on University Notre Dame website]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | <references /> |
"Epistemological Letters" are not a scientific journal in the ordinary sense. They want to create a basis for an open and informal discussion allowing confrontation and ripening of ideas before publishing in some adequate journal.
Lettres Épistemologiques
Epistemologische BriefeHidden Variables and Quantum Uncertainty
The Epistemological Letters (Epistemol. Lett.) are underground scientific journal publications (more details here) at a time when academic journals were regarding foundations of quantum mechanics as not a scientific topic.
Notable Letters include this debate over the years between Bell and Shimony et al. on local realism: