In Fig. 5.26, we show for Point 2 a similar
overall picture as Fig. 5.19 does for
Point 1. Point 2 has larger dissipation and to current estimates,
corresponds more closely to the best systems available at the time of
writing. As opposed to Point 1, a small cavity pumping has a strong
influence on the result, so we display more cases, namely those that
range from no cavity pumping (first row) to large cavity pumping
(, 4th row) with two intermediate cases showing the transfer
of the emission from the vacuum Rabi doublet to the inner peaks
arising from transitions between higher manifolds.
![]() |
![]() |
The fifth row shows the corresponding direct exciton emission, for the
extreme cases of no (1st row) and highest (4th) cavity pumping. The
cavity pumping has the important role of revealing the quantum
nonlinearity of the system, that was obvious for reference point 1 in
any case but is now invisible in the first row, where at increasing
electronic pumping, the vacuum Rabi doublet undergoes a rather dull
collapse. The same spectra could be expected from a linear (bosonic)
model, in the appropriate range of parameters. This is particularly
evident in Fig. 5.27 where three cases of
cavity pumping (none, intermediate, and large) are shown for various
electronic pumping, both for the cavity and direct emission. Outer
lines correspond to zero and inner lines to larger cavity
pumping. Note how the intermediate cavity pumping cases display
obvious deviation from a bosonic model, that has essentially the shape
of a doublet of Lorentzian peaks (with a dispersive correction that
has little bearing on the qualitative aspect of the final
result). Cavity pumping literally unravels the nonlinearity. The case
of intermediate pumping is the most determining in this aspect as far
as cavity emission is concerned, while higher cavity pumpings are more
favorable for uncovering quantum features from the direct exciton
emission. This is mainly for two reasons. One has to do with the
influence of what effective quantum state is realized in the system,
that we will discuss in more details in connection with the third
reference point. The other being the excitation of higher manifolds
from the Jaynes-Cummings ladder, that are now less accessible because
of the larger dissipation rates. Note how the disappearance of the
vacuum Rabi doublet with increasing (with no cavity
pumping), is of a different character than for Point 1, where higher
resulted in an excitation of the upper manifolds and a
transfer of the dynamics higher in the Jaynes-Cummings ladder, whereas
in this case it essentially results in a competition between only the
first and second manifold transitions. Cavity pumping can help
climbing the ladder with no prejudice to broadening. Finally, even if
blurry resolution or statistical noise of an actual experiment would
cast doubt on the presence of a quadruplet in such a structure, the
transfer with increasing cavity pumping of the emission from outer
(vacuum Rabi) to inner peaks (from the second manifold transitions in
this case) makes it clear that the underlying statistics is of a Fermi
rather than of a Bose character. In
Fig. 5.28, we show the
case
for such an increasing cavity pumping for a
detailed appreciation of the previous statement. A very close look
might still suggest that the case
(outer peaks) still has a
small deviation from the linear model that would betray, in a very
finely resolved experiment, its nonbosonic or nonlinear
character. Counter to intuition, this is better seen for vanishing
electronic pumping, as otherwise the lines are broadened according to
Eq. (5.16) and this dampens the inner
nonlinear peaks. Note, on the other hand, how cavity pumping
unambiguously settles the issue.
Elena del Valle ©2009-2010-2011-2012.