m (Created page with "{{wl2}} {{schenzle86a}} {{wtps}} <center><wz tip="">750px</wz></center> This concerns the dynamics of strongly driven 3LS, wi...") |
m |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<center><wz tip="">[[File:Screenshot_20240113_172352.png|400px]]</wz></center> | <center><wz tip="">[[File:Screenshot_20240113_172352.png|400px]]</wz></center> | ||
| − | Photon-counting statistics are calculated to both two and three-level systems, which should be compared to our results. | + | Photon-counting statistics are calculated to both two and three-level systems, which should be compared to our results. See also Refs. {{onlinecite|javanainen86b}} |
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:43, 13 January 2024
Macroscopic quantum jumps in a single atom. A. Schenzle and R. G. Brewer in Phys. Rev. A 34:3127 (1986). What the paper says?
This concerns the dynamics of strongly driven 3LS, with coherent fields (this is pre-EIT). The problem is related to quantum-jumps and whether there is interruption of the signal under CW driving. A detailed theoretical description of spontaneous emission from a three-level system is needed, which is offered in the V configuration ($\Lambda$ in appendix):
There is an interesting introduction (of a historical character?) with insights from Dehmelt and Cook & Kimble.
On the similarity between coherent & incoherent pumping:
Photon-counting statistics are calculated to both two and three-level systems, which should be compared to our results. See also Refs. [1]