This wikilog article is a draft, it was not published yet.

Computacion I

⇠ Back to Blog:Sandbox

1st problem

The average scores per problem are (out of 10):

4.125, 6.875, 3.875, 6.125, 8., 5.75, 3.625, 2.25

making Fractals highly acclaimed and statistical inference the most dreaded (little surprise in both cases).

The average scores of group are:

5.5, 3.625, 5.875, 6.125, 5., 4.125, 4.625, 5.75

which itself has average 5.08.

The distribution of scores:

The maximum one is 72 and minimum is 10 (out of 80). There are four degenerate combinations:

1, 5, 3, 8, 2, 4, 6, 7
1, 5, 3, 8, 4, 2, 6, 7
6, 5, 3, 8, 2, 4, 1, 7
6, 5, 3, 8, 4, 2, 1, 7

which arise from groups 1 and 7, on the one hand, and 5 and 6, on the other, having expressed equal preferences (in their own vote) for the same projects.

We are thus left with:

Group 2-> Project 5

Group 3-> Project 3

Group 4-> Project 8

Group 8-> Project 7

and then, Group (1,7)->Project (1,6) and Group (5,6)->Project (2,4)

The final scores per group are:

7, 10, 9, 8, 10, 10, 8, 10

Half the groups get their highest rated choice, one gets their 2nd best choice. One group (first) gets assigned a project with the lowest collective note (still 7) and they can chose from degeneracy.

Computación I: Projects

Robust Measures of Tail Weight

We explore the meaning of the kurtosis of a function based and https://wis.kuleuven.be/stat/robust/papers/2006/tailweight.pdf

Cellular Automata

— • 07:16, 23 February 2016