m 1 revision imported |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The '''''Polariton''''' is a quasi-particle in condensed matter systems, where it describes the superposition of an excitation—typically an [[exciton]] (itself the quasi-particle that arises from binding a solid-state electron with a valence hole){{cite|laussy24a}}—with a photon. | The '''''Polariton''''' is a quasi-particle in condensed matter systems, where it describes the superposition of an excitation—typically an [[exciton]] (itself the quasi-particle that arises from binding a solid-state electron with a valence hole){{cite|laussy24a}}—with a photon. | ||
The concept was first proposed theoretically, and christened, by [[John Hopfield]]{{cite|hopfield58a}}, and its most fruitful implementation, in 2D, was discovered experimentally during a sabbatical stay in [[Arakawa]]'s group in [[Tokyo]] by [[Claude Weisbuch]].{{cite| | The concept was first proposed theoretically, and christened so, by [[John Hopfield]]{{cite|hopfield58a}}, and its most fruitful implementation, in 2D, was discovered experimentally during a sabbatical stay in [[Arakawa]]'s group in [[Tokyo]] by [[Claude Weisbuch]],{{cite|weisbuch92a}} who referred to it as his {{onlinequote|Japanese effect.}}{{cite|houdre05a}} Weisbuch did not initially recognized it as a ''Hopfield polariton'', or "bulk polariton", for which the photon is delocalized in the full 3D crystal, but as a cavity QED effect (Weisbuch was in fact already a polariton expert, having reported its first resonant observation 15 years earlier{{cite|weisbuch77a}}). The situation was quickly settled during the [[July (1993)]] Erice Summer School on "Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications" which featured {{onlinequote|heated sessions (involving in particular the two Elis, Eli Burstein and Eli Yablonovitch) on the nature of these excitations}} according to Weisbuch himself.{{cite|weisbuch05b}} The name of "Cavity-Polariton" was then agreed to well describe Hopfield's counterpart in reduced dimensionality, and be more suitable than Weisbuch's initial choice for merly Rabi splitting: | ||
{{quote|The term "vacuum field Rabi splitting" has so far been used for semiconductor microcavities in analogy to atomic physics where this effect was first observed. From a solid state physics point of view, where dispersion has to be considered, the term "cavity-polariton" is more appropriate.|[[R. Houdré]], [[R.P. Stanley]] and [[U. Oesterle]]|{{weisbuch_book93a}}}} | {{quote|The term "vacuum field Rabi splitting" has so far been used for semiconductor microcavities in analogy to atomic physics where this effect was first observed. From a solid state physics point of view, where dispersion has to be considered, the term "cavity-polariton" is more appropriate.|[[R. Houdré]], [[R.P. Stanley]] and [[U. Oesterle]]|{{weisbuch_book93a}}}} | ||
It seems that the theorists who should have predicted cavity-polaritons are [[C. Andreani]]{{etal}},{{cite|andreani91a}} who narrowly missed it by overlooking the dimensionality mismatch could be fixed with a cavity. | The first appearance of the "cavity polariton" term was in Ref. {{onlinecite|houdre94b}}, where the idea of the underlying dispersion was being formed. The breakthrough came in Ref. {{onlinecite|houdre04a}} where the now famous polariton dispersion was provided for the first time: | ||
<center><wz tip="The first apparition of the now famous lower and upper polariton branches.">[[File:houdre94a-polariton-dispersions.jpg|360px]]</wz></center> | |||
It seems that the theorists who should have predicted cavity-polaritons are [[C. Andreani]]{{etal}},{{cite|andreani91a}} who narrowly missed it by overlooking the dimensionality mismatch could be fixed with a cavity. He seems, however, to have readily understood (and explained) it to [[R. Houdré]]{{etal}} as they were shaping the field.{{cite|houdre05a}} | |||
Historical overviews includes Refs. {{onlinecite|Weisbuch05b}}{{onlinecite|houdre05a}}, etc. | |||
Important concepts (I'm particularly interested in) include: | |||
* [[Polariton laser]] & [[polariton condensation]] | * [[Polariton laser]] & [[polariton condensation]] | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
== To do == | == To do == | ||
A historical review of the polariton concept, from Hopfield's lone-warrior paper{{cite|hopfield58a}} that gets all the credit despite fairly serious variations with the finally adopted results, along with other contributions.{{cite|huang51a}}{{cite|pekar57a}} | A historical review of the polariton concept, from Hopfield's lone-warrior paper{{cite|hopfield58a}} that gets all the credit despite fairly serious variations with the finally adopted results (including in its operational definition, involving four operators), along with other contributions.{{cite|huang51a}}{{cite|pekar57a}} | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
The Polariton is a quasi-particle in condensed matter systems, where it describes the superposition of an excitation—typically an exciton (itself the quasi-particle that arises from binding a solid-state electron with a valence hole)[1]—with a photon.
The concept was first proposed theoretically, and christened so, by John Hopfield[2], and its most fruitful implementation, in 2D, was discovered experimentally during a sabbatical stay in Arakawa's group in Tokyo by Claude Weisbuch,[3] who referred to it as his «Japanese effect.»[4] Weisbuch did not initially recognized it as a Hopfield polariton, or "bulk polariton", for which the photon is delocalized in the full 3D crystal, but as a cavity QED effect (Weisbuch was in fact already a polariton expert, having reported its first resonant observation 15 years earlier[5]). The situation was quickly settled during the July (1993) Erice Summer School on "Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications" which featured «heated sessions (involving in particular the two Elis, Eli Burstein and Eli Yablonovitch) on the nature of these excitations» according to Weisbuch himself.[6] The name of "Cavity-Polariton" was then agreed to well describe Hopfield's counterpart in reduced dimensionality, and be more suitable than Weisbuch's initial choice for merly Rabi splitting:
The term "vacuum field Rabi splitting" has so far been used for semiconductor microcavities in analogy to atomic physics where this effect was first observed. From a solid state physics point of view, where dispersion has to be considered, the term "cavity-polariton" is more appropriate.
The first appearance of the "cavity polariton" term was in Ref. [7], where the idea of the underlying dispersion was being formed. The breakthrough came in Ref. [8] where the now famous polariton dispersion was provided for the first time:
It seems that the theorists who should have predicted cavity-polaritons are C. Andreani et al.,[9] who narrowly missed it by overlooking the dimensionality mismatch could be fixed with a cavity. He seems, however, to have readily understood (and explained) it to R. Houdré et al. as they were shaping the field.[4]
Historical overviews includes Refs. [10][4], etc.
Important concepts (I'm particularly interested in) include:
A historical review of the polariton concept, from Hopfield's lone-warrior paper[2] that gets all the credit despite fairly serious variations with the finally adopted results (including in its operational definition, involving four operators), along with other contributions.[11][12]