m 1 revision imported |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Polariton = | = Polariton = | ||
The '''''Polariton''''' is a quasi-particle in condensed matter systems, where it describes the superposition of an excitation—typically an [[exciton]] (itself the quasi-particle that arises from binding a solid-state electron with a valence hole)—with a photon. | The '''''Polariton''''' is a quasi-particle in condensed matter systems, where it describes the superposition of an excitation—typically an [[exciton]] (itself the quasi-particle that arises from binding a solid-state electron with a valence hole){{cite|laussy24a}}—with a photon. | ||
The concept was first proposed theoretically by [[John Hopfield]]{{cite|hopfield58a}} and | The concept was first proposed theoretically, and christened, by [[John Hopfield]]{{cite|hopfield58a}}, and its most fruitful implementation, in 2D, was discovered experimentally during a sabbatical stay in [[Arakawa]]'s group in [[Tokyo]] by [[Claude Weisbuch]].{{cite|weisbuch92a}} Weisbuch did not initially recognized it as a ''Hopfield polariton'', or "bulk polariton", for which the photon is delocalized in the full 3D crystal, but as a cavity QED effect (Weisbuch was in fact already a polariton expert, having reported its first resonant observation 15 years earlier{{cite|weisbuch77a}}). The situation was quickly settled during the [[July (1993)]] Erice Summer School on "Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications" which featured {{onlinequote|heated sessions (involving in particular the two Elis, Eli Burstein and Eli Yablonovitch) on the nature of these excitations}} according to Weisbuch himself.{{cite|weisbuch05b}} The name of "Cavity-Polariton" was then agreed to well describe Hopfield's counterpart in reduced dimensionality, and be more suitable than Weisbuch's initial choice for Rabi splitting: | ||
{{quote|The term "vacuum field Rabi splitting" has so far been used for semiconductor microcavities in analogy to atomic physics where this effect was first observed. From a solid state physics point of view, where dispersion has to be considered, the term "cavity-polariton" is more appropriate.|[[R. Houdré]], [[R.P. Stanley]] and [[U. Oesterle]]|{{weisbuch_book93a}}}} | |||
It seems that the theorists who should have predicted cavity-polaritons are [[C. Andreani]]{{etal}},{{cite|andreani91a}} who narrowly missed it by overlooking the dimensionality mismatch could be fixed with a cavity. | |||
* [[Polariton laser]] | |||
* [[Polariton vortices]] | * [[Polariton vortices]] | ||
* [[Polariton qubits]] | * [[Polariton qubits]] | ||
The Polariton is a quasi-particle in condensed matter systems, where it describes the superposition of an excitation—typically an exciton (itself the quasi-particle that arises from binding a solid-state electron with a valence hole)[1]—with a photon.
The concept was first proposed theoretically, and christened, by John Hopfield[2], and its most fruitful implementation, in 2D, was discovered experimentally during a sabbatical stay in Arakawa's group in Tokyo by Claude Weisbuch.[3] Weisbuch did not initially recognized it as a Hopfield polariton, or "bulk polariton", for which the photon is delocalized in the full 3D crystal, but as a cavity QED effect (Weisbuch was in fact already a polariton expert, having reported its first resonant observation 15 years earlier[4]). The situation was quickly settled during the July (1993) Erice Summer School on "Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications" which featured «heated sessions (involving in particular the two Elis, Eli Burstein and Eli Yablonovitch) on the nature of these excitations» according to Weisbuch himself.[5] The name of "Cavity-Polariton" was then agreed to well describe Hopfield's counterpart in reduced dimensionality, and be more suitable than Weisbuch's initial choice for Rabi splitting:
The term "vacuum field Rabi splitting" has so far been used for semiconductor microcavities in analogy to atomic physics where this effect was first observed. From a solid state physics point of view, where dispersion has to be considered, the term "cavity-polariton" is more appropriate.
It seems that the theorists who should have predicted cavity-polaritons are C. Andreani et al.,[6] who narrowly missed it by overlooking the dimensionality mismatch could be fixed with a cavity.
A historical review of the polariton concept, from Hopfield's lone-warrior paper[2] that gets all the credit despite fairly serious variations with the finally adopted results, along with other contributions.[7][8]