| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{The Hamiltonian may then be taken to be trivial: | {{quote|The Hamiltonian may then be taken to be trivial: H=0.|author={{yoo97a}}|style={{opencite}}}} | ||
= Juha Javanainen = | = Juha Javanainen = | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* {{javanainen96a}} | * {{javanainen96a}} | ||
* {{javanainen97a}} | * {{javanainen97a}} | ||
* {{yoo97a}} | |||
He concurs with us that interactions are not necessary for BEC and that this is driven by pure Bosonic effects instead. | He concurs with us that interactions are not necessary for BEC and that this is driven by pure Bosonic effects instead. | ||
Latest revision as of 18:35, 3 February 2025
«The Hamiltonian may then be taken to be trivial: H=0.»
Juha Javanainen
Juha Javanainen is a theoretical physicist working on atomic BEC (with works relevant to quantum optics).
He is the type of people I naturally feel associated with, for stories such as the one where his son detonated a home-made bomb in the backyard, for which Javanainen served community service and was put under probation [1].
He interests us particularly for his work on phase symmetry breaking in condensates, where he first predicted multiphoton symmetry breaking:
- Spontaneous symmetry breaking derived from a stochastic interpretation of quantum mechanics. J. Javanainen in Phys. Lett. A 161:207 (1991).
- Quantum Phase of a Bose-Einstein Condensate with an Arbitrary Number of Atoms. J. Javanainen and S. M. Yoo in Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:161 (1996).
- Phase and Phase Diffusion of a Split Bose-Einstein Condensate. J. Javanainen and M. Wilkens in Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:4675 (1997).
- Interference of two Bose-Einstein condensates. S. M. Yoo, J. Ruostekoski and J. Javanainen in J. Mod. Opt. 44:1763 (1997).
He concurs with us that interactions are not necessary for BEC and that this is driven by pure Bosonic effects instead.
See also Ref. [1].
Links
- Homepage (with a low-res photo in front of APS journals.
) - Google Scholar.
