Paradigm for Two-Photon Cascade Intensity Correlation Experiments. G. M. Meyer, G. S. Agarwal, H. Huang and M. O. Scully in Electron Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics. NATO ASI Series 358:111 (1997).  What the paper says!?

Screenshot 20240626 193425.png


«Quantum electrodynamics is a spectacularly successful theory, nowhere are its successes more numerous than in modern quantum optics.»

The paper studies intensity correlation (interferometry) from the two-photon cascade emission of a single three-level atom. It identifies two basic experimental implementations:

Screenshot 20240626 193718.png

They consider a given type of quantum state for the two-photon packet and track down interferences through the two schemes, which they claim to unify:

Screenshot 20240626 194148.png

They assume this (entangled) wavefunction:

Screenshot 20240626 200427.png

which gives rise to the following terms in the calculation of the coincidences, in the respective two configurations:

Screenshot 20240626 200327.png

from which they arrive to (time-integrated) correlations covering both cases:

Screenshot 20240626 200709.png

They treat in particular two configurations, with radiative imbalances (while we tend to focus on cases where they are the same):

Screenshot 20240626 205028.png

In various limits, keeping or not various terms of the interferences, this reproduce Franson, HOM and still other cases, so this represents a quite important and enlightening result.

They also consider what they call an "interrupted cascade":

Screenshot 20240626 203150.png

This concept is important to us as it is the opposite of our leapfrog transition. This begs the question, how does this compare the cascade above? To us, this is interrupted (by the intermediate, real state). Unfortunately, the Authors comment little about the relationships and differences, only commenting that in one limit, they have "the same dominant terms":

Screenshot 20240626 204156.png