(→Metrics for 2010) |
m |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[Fabrice]]'s metrics | + | = [[Fabrice]]'s publication metrics = |
− | + | Since [[2012]], there is no need of recording publication metrics since [http://scholar.google.com Google Scholar] made them open access for everybody. | |
+ | So if you are interested in my current metrics, '''[https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8V5GE_IAAAAJ&hl=en head this way].''' | ||
− | According to the [http://apps.isiknowledge.com ISI Web of Science] as of [[ | + | Or see the actual [[Fabrice's full list of publications|publications]] instead. |
+ | |||
+ | == Google Scholar == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Google Scholar is a fairly good marker of publications, as it is freely accessible and actually of higher quality than other engines (it has a little, but not much, contamination from spurious citations, such as abstracts in conferences, unpublished university thesis at the undergraduate level, etc. However it catches most of them, and it is better to put some that shouldn't be than to miss others that should). | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Metrics for 2012 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | for the first 20 entries: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:Fabrice_P._Laussy-Google_Scholar_Citations-2012.png]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | = ISI Web of Knowledge (WoK) = | ||
+ | |||
+ | This tool seems less stable (data for past years fluctuate more) and less reliable then Google Scholar. The main inconvenient of the ISI WoK though is that it is not freely available. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Metrics for 2011 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | According to the [http://apps.isiknowledge.com ISI Web of Science] as of [[1 January|1]], [[January (2012)|January]] [[2012|(2012)]]: | ||
* Sum of the Times Cited: 546 | * Sum of the Times Cited: 546 | ||
Line 14: | Line 33: | ||
[[Image:Wok-Laussy-2011-2.png|700px]] | [[Image:Wok-Laussy-2011-2.png|700px]] | ||
− | = Metrics for 2010 = | + | == Metrics for 2010 == |
According to the [http://apps.isiknowledge.com ISI Web of Science] as of [[4 January|4]], [[January (2011)|January]] [[2011|(2011)]]: | According to the [http://apps.isiknowledge.com ISI Web of Science] as of [[4 January|4]], [[January (2011)|January]] [[2011|(2011)]]: | ||
Line 27: | Line 46: | ||
[[Image:Wok-laussy-2010-2.png|700px]] | [[Image:Wok-laussy-2010-2.png|700px]] | ||
− | = Metrics for 2009 = | + | == Metrics for 2009 == |
According to the [http://apps.isiknowledge.com ISI Web of Science] as of [[29 January|29]], [[January (2010)|January]] [[2010|(2010)]]: | According to the [http://apps.isiknowledge.com ISI Web of Science] as of [[29 January|29]], [[January (2010)|January]] [[2010|(2010)]]: |
Contents |
Since 2012, there is no need of recording publication metrics since Google Scholar made them open access for everybody. So if you are interested in my current metrics, head this way.
Or see the actual publications instead.
Google Scholar is a fairly good marker of publications, as it is freely accessible and actually of higher quality than other engines (it has a little, but not much, contamination from spurious citations, such as abstracts in conferences, unpublished university thesis at the undergraduate level, etc. However it catches most of them, and it is better to put some that shouldn't be than to miss others that should).
for the first 20 entries:
This tool seems less stable (data for past years fluctuate more) and less reliable then Google Scholar. The main inconvenient of the ISI WoK though is that it is not freely available.
According to the ISI Web of Science as of 1, January (2012):
According to the ISI Web of Science as of 4, January (2011):
According to the ISI Web of Science as of 29, January (2010):